<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Time to start thinking about the next election</title>
	<atom:link href="http://publicstrategist.com/2010/05/time-to-start-thinking-about-the-next-election/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://publicstrategist.com/2010/05/time-to-start-thinking-about-the-next-election/</link>
	<description>Working to make government work better</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 13:35:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: A footnote to purdah &#124; Public Strategist</title>
		<link>http://publicstrategist.com/2010/05/time-to-start-thinking-about-the-next-election/comment-page-1/#comment-2990</link>
		<dc:creator>A footnote to purdah &#124; Public Strategist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 18:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://publicstrategist.com/?p=1400#comment-2990</guid>
		<description>[...] I wrote yesterday about whether the idea of civil servants staying silent would remain viable in future election campaigns. Patrick Butler has now reflected back that thought more elegantly than I managed: Purdah looks less workable now, when social media &#8211; Twitter, blogs, Facebook &#8211; is so universal. It is easy enough to silence the departmental tweets. But what about the individuals-who-also-happen-to-be-public-servants, who, in their private lives use social media to comment, discuss and argue (non-impartially) on the issues of the day, including politics. When, for example, are they tweeting in their capacity as civil servants and when as private individuals? (the same question might be asked of journalists). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I wrote yesterday about whether the idea of civil servants staying silent would remain viable in future election campaigns. Patrick Butler has now reflected back that thought more elegantly than I managed: Purdah looks less workable now, when social media &#8211; Twitter, blogs, Facebook &#8211; is so universal. It is easy enough to silence the departmental tweets. But what about the individuals-who-also-happen-to-be-public-servants, who, in their private lives use social media to comment, discuss and argue (non-impartially) on the issues of the day, including politics. When, for example, are they tweeting in their capacity as civil servants and when as private individuals? (the same question might be asked of journalists). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William</title>
		<link>http://publicstrategist.com/2010/05/time-to-start-thinking-about-the-next-election/comment-page-1/#comment-2981</link>
		<dc:creator>William</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 15:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://publicstrategist.com/?p=1400#comment-2981</guid>
		<description>Ah yes. Various matters on which I&#039;d like to break purdah with you :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah yes. Various matters on which I&#8217;d like to break purdah with you <img src='http://publicstrategist.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

